I feel good about the format of my résumé, which I started in college. I have a master copy on my computer (and flash drive) that I update every time I start a new job or get a new qualification. I also have a notebook with this information. I try to keep current with layout and content expectations, so once in a while I'll tweak a few things, but the information is always there for me to work with.
The first version of my résumé was a chronological list of jobs and the duties sounded like an abbreviated job description. This is how the career advisor at college helped me create my résumé. As I've read about current conventions and gotten feedback from employers, I changed things so that the duties read more as specific actions ("Lead groups of 10 -13 teenagers on adventure trips" instead of "Head counselor during trips"). I also changed from chronological to categorical-chronological organization.
This way, if a hiring manager doesn't care about my experience teaching at camps, they can skip straight to the library section and see what I've done there. I've gotten mixed reviews for this format, but my work experience is so diverse, it makes the most sense to me and the feedback skews slightly towards favorable, so I'll keep this format until I change my mind or I have enough directly relevant experience that it doesn't matter.
Another thing I've changed is to make separate résumés for different positions and include only the experience that is relevant to the job posting. For example, if I'm applying for an instruction librarian position, I don't include the seven months I spent working on a guest ranch or the nine months I worked as a hotel housekeeper. These kinds of jobs are in my work history on the application. I use the résumé to help focus the hiring committee's attention on the relevant experience. Alternately, if I'm applying for concession work (yes, some seasonal places want a résumé), I put all the hotel, retail, and restaurant experience on the resume and leave off library and teaching experience.
My cover letters have gone through changes, too. When I first wrote cover letters, they were basically full sentence versions of parts of my résumé. As I've read and experimented and gotten more practice, they now (I hope) show some of my strengths and abilities that aren't listed on the résumé and point to the résumé as proof for what the cover letter says.
One thing I now believe about applications, cover letters, and résumés: there is alot of bad advice out there! If something feels weird or like a bad idea, it probably is. Telling myself that I need to do hard things to get what I want and since I'm not getting interviews, I should try another approach has caused me to do some things that I wish I hadn't. (Email a hiring manager every week to express continuing interest? No. Bad advice.) Also, career offices and employment agencies don't always know what they are talking about. It takes work to stay on top of current expectations. That work is something each person should do for himself; career coaches don't necessarily do that work.
Two people who I think offer solid advice on job searching and employment in general are Alison Green of Ask A Manager and Suzanne Lucas of Evil HR Lady. I like them because they are sensible and advocate avoiding coyness and games. I'm really bad at playing social games, so I appreciate anyone who makes suggestions for appropriately saying what you mean. Their work also helps take some of the mystery out of what is going on in an employer's mind.
Two of the most helpful things I found while job searching are statements Alison Green says in her free guide to preparing for an interview. Essentially, she says that if you are called for an interview, they have already decided that you meet their initial qualifications; no competent interviewer will interview someone they wouldn't even consider hiring. The other thing is that weird people get hired all the time. This encourages me that if nerves make me stutter while answering a hard question or if I blank for two seconds before understanding what a question means, maybe all is not lost.
Also, I'm starting more and more to be natural and avoid presenting the shiny-can't-keep-this-up-for-more-than-a-few-hours version. I think I always did this to some extent; it's hard for me to pretend to be different from who I am. The difference is that now I don't feel guilty illustrating all my answers with an example or analogy or giving a simple one sentence answer when that's all I have to say. This is how I am in real life and I have come to think that interviewers deserve to know the actuality of who they'll be working with, just as I want to go past the shiny truth and see the real truth of a prospective employer.
This leads to my next change. In interviews, I have started asking the questions I want to know and asking them just as the interviewers ask me. For example, I used to think it was too direct to ask, "What is a typical work day like? Can you tell me about the culture here?" So I struggled to find out this information with sideways questions. It didn't work out so well. Now I ask these questions directly.
I haven't yet been hired, so who knows if I'm on the right track, but at least I am acting in a way that prevents me from cringing in embarrassment and does get me the information I want.


RSS Feed



















